- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
As everyone know here, we are against the finances of this project from day 1 and feel the taxpayers are were going to get stuck paying for alot of the costs. This project will be far from being revenue neutral.... To date we have been proven correct....
We have acknowledged here, however, that the park looks great and is a great fan experience, but one thing is starting to bother us. There is one thing that we have not heard, not even once???
Not heard one person say that the game was great!!
Stayed all 9 innings can't wait to see the next game.
That is nobody's fault but more a commentary on the state of baseball. Personally this year I have not watched one inning of the Boston Red Sox and I lived and dies with the Sox..... After the honeymoon is over, you have wonder what the attendance numbers will look like 5 years from now.
Already know season ticket holders who say they can not give their tickets away.??
This all goes back to our point from the very beginning.
The City of Worcester should not be in the
- Hospital business
- Nursing home business
- Airport business
- Convention Center business
- Train Station business
- Golf Course business
- Baseball stadium business
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Who needs money to fix city things when we can use it to pay Larry Lucchino’s bills so that he can increase his profits ?
Also, a building on Sudbury St. Downtown is being converted to 165 loft units.
Like I mentioned, the convention center has lots of potential but there is a lot holding it back. The arena is the better revenue source than the convention center just because they have 2 tenants (railers and pirates) that occupy the arena 11/12 months of the year but the convention center can still be good and used quite often if they tried to market events.
https://www.milb.com/worcester/news/fourth-of-july-tradition