This sounds like the kind of language you include in a contract if you want the contract to be able to be interpreted as saying anything you (or Larry Lucchino) want it to say.
Let’s look at the bright side… maybe they mean they will take an absolute hard line on any future requests by the team or it’s owners.
No, I don’t believe it either. But maybe.
Who in their right mind spends nearly $200m on a minor league stadium that seats, what, 10,000 fans (in theory. We know it’s not going to be 10,000 fans anytime soon, if ever)?
So there was a cap to protect the city, but there was a cap to the cap, therefore ultimately protecting the Red Sox? Nicely done!
Your headline is better than mine!
This sounds like the kind of language you include in a contract if you want the contract to be able to be interpreted as saying anything you (or Larry Lucchino) want it to say.
Let’s look at the bright side… maybe they mean they will take an absolute hard line on any future requests by the team or it’s owners.
No, I don’t believe it either. But maybe.
Who in their right mind spends nearly $200m on a minor league stadium that seats, what, 10,000 fans (in theory. We know it’s not going to be 10,000 fans anytime soon, if ever)?